"A recession is the worst time to raise the cost of low-skilled unemployment." Is there a good time?
« Roger Noll Predicts Balsillie Will Get the Coyotes and Move Them to Hamilton, On. | Main | Mark Davis: Obama's Job is Not to Run the Economy »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345158c869e201157115cc20970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference David Neumark: Delay the Minimum Wage Hike:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
If you look at the post WW II US record the rule for the impact of higher minimum wages on teenage employment is complex.
One, if the wage hike occurs during an economic expansion it has no impact on teenage unemployment. About half of minimum wage hikes have been during expansion and in each of those instances teen unemployment fell significantly. Just the opposite of what is taught in introductory economics.
Two, if the wage hike occurs during a recession teenage unemployment rises. But that appears to be largely because of the recession, not the minimum wage hike.
The dominant determinant of the teenage unemployment rate appears to be the adult unemployment rate while changes in the minimum wages appear to have a minimal impact.
http://angrybear.blogspot.com/2008/06/minimum-wage-teenage-unemployment.html
Posted by: spencer | June 15, 2009 at 03:46 PM
What are the studies for this particular finding that you cite? Card and Krueger 1995, 2000?
Posted by: Ihsuan | June 15, 2009 at 08:21 PM
He cites a blog post at Angry Bear that he wrote that provides some graphs to show that teenage employment follows the business cycle. No doubt that is a major explanation of teenage employment trends, but it's hardly sufficient evidence that the minimum wage does not matter.
Posted by: Phil | June 16, 2009 at 11:26 AM