This is really sad, but not surprising.
In June, 2005, the Supreme Court infamously decided
that cities could condemn peoples’ land to give to private developers
provided the government had written an economic development plan for
the project. In response to arguments that many previous such plans had
failed, the Supreme Court merely said that “we decline to second-guess
the City’s considered judgments about the efficacy of its development
plan.”
A decision that was roundly criticized by economists. How'd it work out?
Three years after the decision, no one had to second-guess the city’s
judgments. Instead, it was clear that they were wrong. The homes of
Susette Kelo and her neighbors have all been torn down or removed. But,
except for the remodeling of one government building into another
government building, virtually no new development had taken place in the Fort Trumbull district by May, 2008.
Some people continue to believe that government is the savior, the one that, if only we could get the right people in, would set things straight.
Via Warren Meyer








Maybe Suzette Kelo's spell was effective?
http://www.eclectecon.net/2007/01/susette-kelo-ti.html
Posted by: EclectEcon | November 18, 2008 at 07:53 AM